I just read a scathing denunciation of Bush's presidency. It wasn't written for a Madison newspaper (notoriously liberal), nor for a Chicago paper (likewise). It wasn't even published on a Democratic website. No, this article comes to us from The American Conservative.
What exactly do I mean by a "scathing denunciation"? Judge the author's words for yourself:
And then, we get a piece written to persuade conservatives why they must not vote for Bush. This includes:
...
I still don't know if I can vote for Kerry with a clean conscience. I'd really like to vote "None of the Above", but I know that's a cop-out.
What exactly do I mean by a "scathing denunciation"? Judge the author's words for yourself:
In Europe and indeed all over the world, [Bush] has made the United States despised by people who used to be its friends, by businessmen and the middle classes, by moderate and sensible liberals. Never before have democratic foreign governments needed to demonstrate disdain for Washington to their own electorates in order to survive in office.
And then, we get a piece written to persuade conservatives why they must not vote for Bush. This includes:
The final conservative redoubt is Bush's admirable personal life. Alas, other characteristics of his seem less well suited to the presidency. By his own admission he doesn't do nuance and doesn't read. He doesn't appear to reflect on his actions and seems unable to concede even the slightest mistake. Nor is he willing to hold anyone else responsible for anything. It is a damning combination. John Kerry may flip-flop, but at least he realizes that circumstances change and sometimes require changed policies. He doesn't cowardly flee at the first mention of accountability.
...
I still don't know if I can vote for Kerry with a clean conscience. I'd really like to vote "None of the Above", but I know that's a cop-out.